Key Takeaways:
- Rep. Jason Crow, a Democrat from Colorado, released a video urging service members to defy illegal and unlawful orders, prompting a strong reaction from the President.
- The President has made threats against Rep. Crow and other lawmakers, including threats of execution and arrest, which Rep. Crow believes are irresponsible and dangerous.
- Rep. Crow argues that the President’s rhetoric is inciting violence and undermining the rule of law, and that it is the duty of lawmakers to remind service members of their obligation to follow the Constitution and the law.
- The issue is not just about the President’s words, but also about the lack of oversight and accountability in Congress, with Rep. Crow arguing that Republicans are blocking efforts to hold the administration accountable.
- The American public is concerned about the lack of information and transparency regarding the administration’s plans, including plans for Venezuela.
Introduction to the Interview
The transcript of the interview with Rep. Jason Crow, Democrat of Colorado, on "Face the Nation with Margaret Brennan" on November 23, 2025, sheds light on the controversy surrounding the President’s rhetoric and the role of lawmakers in holding the administration accountable. Rep. Crow, one of the six lawmakers who released a recorded video urging service members to defy illegal and unlawful orders, joined Margaret Brennan in the studio to discuss the issue. The video prompted a strong reaction from the President, who made threats against Rep. Crow and other lawmakers, including threats of execution and arrest.
The President’s Rhetoric and Its Consequences
Rep. Crow expressed concern about the President’s rhetoric, stating that it is irresponsible and dangerous. The President’s threats, including threats of execution and arrest, have been made against Rep. Crow and other lawmakers who have spoken out against the administration. Rep. Crow believes that the President’s words are inciting violence and undermining the rule of law. He argued that it is the duty of lawmakers to remind service members of their obligation to follow the Constitution and the law, and that the President’s rhetoric is making it difficult for them to do so. For example, Rep. Crow mentioned that the President has a history of making comments that are manifestly unlawful, such as sending troops into Chicago or polling stations, which would be a violation of U.S. law.
The Response from Fellow Veterans
Rep. Crow was asked to respond to allegations from fellow veterans, including Rep. Jack Bergman, a retired three-star Marine Corps general, who argued that Rep. Crow’s video was weakening and corrosive to the military. Rep. Crow disagreed, stating that the video was intended to start a conversation about the President’s rhetoric and the importance of following the law. He argued that the President’s threats, including threats of execution and arrest, are unacceptable and that lawmakers have a duty to speak out against them. Rep. Crow also pointed out that the President’s supporters, including Rep. Bergman, are trying to distract from the issue at hand by making false claims about Rep. Crow’s video.
The Importance of Oversight and Accountability
Rep. Crow emphasized the importance of oversight and accountability in Congress, stating that Republicans are blocking efforts to hold the administration accountable. He argued that Congress has the power to do this, but that Republicans are afraid of what they might learn. Rep. Crow also pointed out that the administration is not providing briefings or information to lawmakers, making it difficult for them to do their job. For example, Rep. Crow mentioned that he has been shut out of the Department of Defense and the CIA as a member of the Intelligence Committee and the Armed Services Committee.
The Role of Lawmakers in Holding the Administration Accountable
Rep. Crow argued that lawmakers have a duty to hold the administration accountable and to ensure that the President is following the law. He stated that the President’s rhetoric is not just a matter of words, but also of actions, and that lawmakers must take a stand against it. Rep. Crow also emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability, stating that the American public has a right to know what the administration is doing and why. He argued that the administration’s lack of transparency and accountability is undermining the trust of the American people and making it difficult for lawmakers to do their job.
The American Public’s Concerns
The American public is concerned about the lack of information and transparency regarding the administration’s plans, including plans for Venezuela. Rep. Crow argued that Congress must take a more active role in holding the administration accountable and providing oversight. He stated that the American public deserves to know what the administration is doing and why, and that lawmakers must take a stand against the President’s rhetoric and actions. According to Rep. Crow, the American public is frustrated with the lack of accountability and transparency in the administration, and is demanding more information and oversight.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the interview with Rep. Jason Crow highlights the controversy surrounding the President’s rhetoric and the role of lawmakers in holding the administration accountable. Rep. Crow’s video urging service members to defy illegal and unlawful orders prompted a strong reaction from the President, who made threats against Rep. Crow and other lawmakers. The issue is not just about the President’s words, but also about the lack of oversight and accountability in Congress. Rep. Crow argued that lawmakers have a duty to remind service members of their obligation to follow the Constitution and the law, and that the President’s rhetoric is making it difficult for them to do so. The American public is concerned about the lack of information and transparency regarding the administration’s plans, and is demanding more oversight and accountability. Ultimately, Rep. Crow’s interview highlights the importance of transparency, accountability, and oversight in ensuring that the administration is following the law and respecting the Constitution.