Key Takeaways
- The UK government has introduced draft regulations that allow it to criminalise support for foreign state proxies deemed a threat to national security.
- The first groups designated under these powers are Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the Iran‑backed Islamic Movement of Companions of the Right (IMCR), and Russia’s GRU Volunteer Corps.
- Inviting, expressing, or materially supporting these organisations will become a criminal offence, with a maximum penalty of life imprisonment.
- The move follows a series of anti‑Semitic attacks in Britain, including the torching of Jewish‑linked ambulances in London.
- Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood and caretaker Prime Minister Keir Starmer say the legislation will make it easier to prosecute those acting on behalf of hostile states.
- The designation is expected to come into force as early as Friday, pending parliamentary approval, and will likely worsen diplomatic ties with Iran and Russia.
Overview of the New Powers
The British government is seeking to use newly drafted regulations that give it “proscription‑like” authority to label foreign state proxies as threats to national security. Once a group is designated, any activity that supports, assists, or benefits the organisation becomes a criminal offence. The legislation removes the requirement for prosecutors to prove a direct link to a foreign state in each case, streamlining prosecutions against individuals who act on behalf of hostile powers. The draft is currently before Parliament and could become law within days if approved.
Context of Rising Anti‑Semitic Violence
The initiative follows a spate of anti‑Semitic hate crimes across the United Kingdom, most notably attacks on Jewish‑linked sites in London. In March, volunteer ambulances operated by a Jewish charity were set ablaze overnight, leading to arson charges against three men in April. Police have also investigated other incidents targeting synagogues, community centres, and Jewish businesses. Authorities contend that these attacks are not isolated acts of bigotry but are orchestrated or encouraged by foreign state‑backed groups seeking to destabilise UK society and intimidate minority communities.
Details of the Draft Regulations
Under the proposed rules, it will be illegal to invite support for, express support for, or provide any material assistance to a designated foreign state proxy. This includes financing, logistics, propaganda, or any conduct likely to materially aid the group’s activities in the UK. Accepting or retaining benefits supplied by or on behalf of the organisation is also prohibited. Violations carry a maximum sentence of life imprisonment, reflecting the government’s assessment that such support enables serious threats ranging from espionage to physical violence.
Groups First Designated Under the Powers
The government has named three entities as the inaugural designations: Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), the Iran‑backed Islamic Movement of Companions of the Right (IMCR), and Russia’s GRU Volunteer Corps. The IRGC is accused of using proxies and criminal networks to target Jewish communities and Iranian dissidents abroad. The IMCR claimed responsibility for seven attacks on Jewish sites in the UK earlier this year. The GRU Volunteer Corps is described as a conduit for Russian military intelligence to conduct covert operations and hostile intelligence collection against the UK and its allies.
Legal Consequences and Penalties
Once the regulations are enacted, anyone found to be supporting or assisting the designated groups could face prosecution under terrorism‑related statutes, with the possibility of a life sentence. The law applies not only to direct members of the organisations but also to individuals who provide facilitative services, such as fundraising, recruitment, or logistical help. By lowering the evidentiary burden—no longer requiring proof of a state connection in each case—the authorities aim to dismantle networks that enable foreign interference more efficiently.
Statements from UK Officials
Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood emphasised that the new powers will allow the state to “track down and put behind bars” those carrying out the “dirty work” of hostile regimes on British soil. Caretaker Prime Minister Keir Starmer echoed this sentiment, stating the measures will make it easier to prosecute and imprison offenders. Foreign Secretary Yvette Cooper has already summoned the Iranian ambassador to protest the alleged involvement of the IRGC in anti‑Semitic attacks, signalling a diplomatic escalation alongside the legal response.
**Al Jazeera Correspondent’s Assessment
Al Jazeera’s Charlie Angela, reporting from London, noted that the designation could take effect “as early as Friday” if Parliament approves the draft. She explained that the change will render any form of support—verbal, financial, or logistical—a criminal act punishable by life imprisonment. Angela warned that the move is likely to provoke a strong reaction from Tehran, further straining UK‑Iran relations, and could also provoke a retaliatory stance from Moscow given the inclusion of the GRU Volunteer Corps.
Iran’s Denial and Broader Allegations
Tehran has consistently denied using proxies to conduct operations abroad, maintaining that its actions are defensive and legitimate. The UK government, however, cites a “long history” of the IRGC employing criminal networks and surrogate groups to target Jewish communities and Iranian dissidents overseas. Officials argue that the pattern of behaviour—ranging from cyber espionage to physical attacks—justifies the proactive designation under the new state‑threat powers.
Russia’s GRU Activities
Regarding the GRU Volunteer Corps, the British authorities contend that Russia employs the unit for foreign intelligence collection and hostile covert operations. They point to a documented record of the GRU targeting the UK and its allies, including cyber intrusions, disinformation campaigns, and occasional violent provocations. By designating the Volunteer Corps, the UK aims to curb Moscow’s ability to use irregular actors to achieve strategic objectives without direct attribution.
Implications for UK Foreign Relations
The simultaneous designation of Iranian and Russian proxies marks a significant shift in Britain’s approach to countering state‑backed malign influence. While the legal tools are intended to bolster domestic security, they are almost certain to exacerbate diplomatic tensions with both Tehran and Moscow. Experts anticipate possible retaliatory measures, ranging from expulsions of diplomats to cyber counter‑operations, and warn that the legislation could complicate ongoing negotiations on issues such as nuclear non‑proliferation and regional security. Nevertheless, the government maintains that protecting citizens from foreign‑orchestrated hate crimes and sabotage justifies the firm stance.

