Matlala Accuses Fannie Nkosi of Receiving Cash for Sibiya, Declines to Name Sources

0
2

Key Takeaways

  • Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala testified before the Madlanga Commission about an April 2025 meeting with KZN police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi, during which he acknowledged that suspended deputy police chief Shadrack Sibiya was collecting money in Gauteng.
  • Matlala identified Sergeant Fannie Nkosi as the middle‑man who allegedly transferred cash to Sibiya, linking Nkosi to a broader money‑collection network involving organised‑crime figures.
  • Sibiya was suspended in July 2025 amid accusations of interfering with politically‑motivated killing investigations; Nkosi was arrested in 2026 after a raid uncovered firearms, cash, and undisclosed case dockets.
  • Matlala, a businessman with a controversial R360‑million SAPS health‑services tender, faces corruption and attempted‑murder charges and claims his testimony could undermine his criminal defence.
  • Allegations include monthly bribes of up to R1 million from Matlala to Sibiya, a R2 million cash payment for a Midrand plot intended for a bed‑and‑breakfast, and a R300 000 wedding gift for Sibiya’s son.
  • Steve Motsumi, a businessman described by Mkhwanazi as “very prominent” in organised‑crime circles, was referenced but Matlala refused to confirm any payments to Sibiya, citing self‑incrimination concerns.
  • Matlala famously pleaded with the commission not to “strip me naked,” arguing that full disclosure would jeopardise his defence strategy.
  • Mkhwanazi revealed he recorded the April 2025 meeting; the recording could clarify what Matlala disclosed about Sibiya’s financiers and may become pivotal evidence.
  • Matlala is expected to return to the commission on a yet‑to‑be‑determined date for further questioning.

Context of the Hearing
On 26 August, Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala appeared before the Madlanga Commission to answer questions about his April 2025 meeting with KwaZulu‑Natal police commissioner Nhlanhla Mkhwanazi. The session, lasting roughly thirty minutes, featured intense exchanges between evidence leader Adila Hassim SC, commission chairperson Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, and Matlala’s counsel, advocate Annelene van den Heever. The central issue was the extent to which Matlala could be compelled to reveal information that might incriminate him in ongoing criminal proceedings. Hassim pressed Matlala on what he knew about alleged money‑collection activities linked to suspended deputy police chief Shadrack Sibiya, while Matlala repeatedly invoked his right against self‑incrimination, arguing that full disclosure would jeopardise his defence.

The Alleged Money‑Collection Network and Sergeant Nkosi
During the questioning, Matlala confirmed that Sibiya was collecting money from individuals in Gauteng but refused to name the contributors. When Hassim sought the source of his information, Matlala disclosed that “a third person” had told him that General Sibiya went to collect money, identifying that intermediary as Sergeant Fannie Nkosi, described as a “middleman” or conduit of cash. Nkosi has since emerged as a pivotal figure in the commission’s inquiry, with evidence placing him at the centre of interactions involving Sibiya, Matlala, and other alleged organised‑crime actors. His role allegedly involved transporting cash from Matlala to Sibiya’s Sandton residence, thereby facilitating the alleged bribery scheme.

Profile of Shadrack Sibiya
Shadrack Sibiya, then Deputy National Police Commissioner, was suspended in July 2025 following allegations that he interfered with investigations into politically motivated killings in KwaZulu‑Natal, particularly the work of the Political Killings Task Team (PKTT). The suspension stemmed from claims that Sibiya used his position to obstruct inquiries that could implicate powerful figures. At the Madlanga Commission, Sibiya has consistently denied accusations of collecting bribes or engaging in corrupt conduct, maintaining that any financial dealings attributed to him are unfounded.

Profile of Fannie Nkosi
Sergeant Fannie Nkosi gained prominence after a 2026 raid on his Pretoria North home uncovered firearms, cash hidden beneath a mattress, and six “undetected” case dockets—documents not recorded in the official SAPS system. He faces multiple charges related to illegal possession of firearms, corruption, and obstructing justice. The commission’s evidence suggests Nkosi acted as a liaison between senior police officials and individuals linked to organised crime, facilitating the movement of money and information that underpins the alleged bribery network involving Sibiya and Matlala.

Background of Vusimuzi Matlala
Vusimuzi “Cat” Matlala is a businessman with a tumultuous legal history. He secured a R360‑million tender to provide health‑services to the South African Police Service (SAPS) through a company called Medicare24; the contract was later cancelled and became the subject of criminal proceedings in the Pretoria Specialised Commercial Crimes Court. Matlala has been accused of attempting to bribe numerous police officers, including efforts to influence then‑police minister Senzo Mchunu. He currently stands trial on charges of corruption and multiple attempted murders, and his testimony before the commission is tightly linked to his defence strategy in those criminal cases.

Steve Motsumi and Organised‑Crime Links
The name Steve Motsumi repeatedly surfaced during the commission’s hearings. Mkhwanazi has described Motsumi as “very prominent” in organised‑crime circles and suggested a possible connection to the alleged “Big Five” cartel. When questioned, Matlala acknowledged knowing Motsumi but refused to confirm whether Motsumi had made payments to Sibiya, again citing the risk of self‑incrimination. The commission has yet to establish definitively the nature of any financial relationship between Motsumi, Sibiya, and Matlala, though Motsumi’s prominence in the underworld remains a point of interest.

Alleged Bribes, Cash Deliveries, and the R2 Million Plot
Witness C testified that Matlala allegedly paid Sibiya up to R1 million per month in bribes, with specific instances highlighted: a R2 million cash payment for the purchase of a plot in Midrand, registered in Sibiya’s wife’s name, intended for a future bed‑and‑breakfast; a R300 000 contribution toward Sibiya’s son’s wedding; and the provision of 20 impalas, which have since died. According to Witness C, Matlala described delivering cash directly to Sibiya’s Sandton home, with Sergeant Nkosi transporting the funds on his behalf. Sibiya has denied all allegations, asserting that the payments never occurred and that the accusations are part of a campaign to tarnish his reputation.

Matlala’s Defence and the “Don’t Strip Me Naked” Plea
Matlala’s central argument before the commission was that his arrest was directly linked to the April 2025 meeting with Mkhwanazi. He contended that revealing too much about the discussion—and the alleged money‑collection network—would undermine his defence in the criminal trials where he is charged with corruption and attempted murder. When pressed, Matlala famously appealed to the commission: “I’m already saying a lot here. At least leave me with half, and I can go to court with half, so don’t take everything. You want me to disclose everything. Just don’t strip me naked, please.” This vivid metaphor underscored his fear that full cooperation would leave him without any strategic advantage in court.

The Recorded Meeting and Future Proceedings
On 18 March 2026, Mkhwanazi informed Parliament’s ad hoc committee that he had recorded his April 2025 meeting with Matlala at The Pearls in Umhlanga. He initially withheld the recording because it pertained to Gauteng Crime Intelligence investigations. The existence of this audio could prove decisive, potentially clarifying what Matlala disclosed about who was paying Sibiya and whether Nkosi was indeed the middle‑man. Matlala has disputed certain aspects of Mkhwanazi’s account, but the recording may resolve discrepancies. Matlala is slated to return to the Madlanga Commission on a date yet to be announced for further questioning, where the recording and his testimony will likely play a central role in shaping the commission’s findings.

SignUpSignUp form

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here