Key Takeaways:
- The New Zealand Parliament has shut down for the year, with party leaders exchanging barbed words in the traditional adjournment debate.
- Prime Minister Christopher Luxon likened Labour to a "picked-over box of favourites" and criticized their policies, while Labour leader Chris Hipkins fired back, accusing Luxon of failing to deliver on his promises.
- The debate saw leaders from various parties, including the Greens, ACT, and NZ First, sharing their thoughts on the past year and looking ahead to 2026.
- The leaders discussed various topics, including education reforms, economic plans, and social issues, with each party presenting their own perspective and criticisms of their opponents.
- The debate was marked by humorous exchanges and personal jabs, but also highlighted the significant challenges and disagreements between the parties.
Introduction to the Adjournment Debate
The New Zealand Parliament has officially shut down for the year, marking the end of a tumultuous and eventful period in the country’s politics. As is traditional, the adjournment debate saw party leaders gather to exchange words, both humorous and serious, about the past year and their hopes for the future. Prime Minister Christopher Luxon set the tone for the debate, likening Labour to a "picked-over box of favourites" and criticizing their policies. He also took aim at the Greens and Te Pāti Māori, accusing them of being "rough and totally nuts" and "anti-everything," respectively.
The Prime Minister’s Address
Luxon’s speech was marked by humorous jabs at his opponents, including Labour’s Justice spokesperson Duncan Webb, who he said was not to be confused with Labour’s tax policy, "which is roger everybody." He also poked fun at Te Pāti Māori’s MPs, suggesting they could be included in David Seymour’s attendance action plan and that the social media ban should be extended to Tākuta Ferris. However, Luxon also acknowledged the challenges faced by the government, including the need to address the country’s economic woes. He expressed confidence in National’s economic plan, saying that more and more people were starting to see its benefits and that he looked forward to asking for their support in 2026.
The Labour Leader’s Response
Labour leader Chris Hipkins fired back at Luxon, accusing him of failing to deliver on his promises and of being out of touch with the needs of ordinary New Zealanders. Hipkins criticized Luxon’s government for increasing youth unemployment, failing to address the cost of living, and ignoring the struggles of families struggling to feed their children. He also launched into a lengthy retelling of a fictional barbecue at Bishop’s place, using the story to poke fun at Luxon and his colleagues. Hipkins finished his speech by expressing his hope that all New Zealanders would enjoy their summer holiday and that the break would provide a chance for the country to recharge and refocus.
The Greens’ Perspective
The Greens’ Marama Davidson gave an earnest and heartfelt account of her battle with breast cancer, thanking the Speaker, Gerry Brownlee, for his support. She also paid tribute to the submitters who opposed the Treaty Principles Bill and criticized benefit sanctions, the ban on puberty blockers, and the reinstatement of pay deductions for partial strikes. Davidson’s speech was a powerful reminder of the human impact of politics and the importance of compassion and empathy in governance. She likened the government’s policies to a dystopian young adult novel, highlighting the need for a more nuanced and thoughtful approach to addressing the country’s challenges.
ACT’s Hopeful Outlook
ACT’s David Seymour said it had been a challenging year for everyone, but he was hopeful about improving economic prospects making 2026 "a cracker." Seymour praised the government’s productivity, noting that they had passed more legislation in the first two years of their term than any MMP Parliament had passed in its whole three years. He also individually praised each of his own MPs, highlighting their contributions to the party’s success. Seymour’s speech was marked by a sense of optimism and confidence, as he looked ahead to the future and the opportunities it would bring.
NZ First’s Ambitions
Winston Peters said NZ First had an "outstanding year" and that it was no longer a question of whether they would make it back into Parliament but instead a question of how many MPs they would get. Peters quickly returned to his usual criticism of the opposition, saying Labour mostly "think that manual labour is the prime minister of Mexico" and that the Greens had "proven themselves to be the most hypocritical, shallow, vacuous bunch of Marxists that we all knew they were." Peters’ speech was marked by his characteristic bluntness and confidence, as he outlined his party’s ambitions and criticized his opponents.
Te Pāti Māori’s Reflections
Te Pāti Māori’s Debbie Ngarewa-Packer said it was a time to reflect, and had been a tough year and a "year of extremism." Ngarewa-Packer criticized the government’s legislation, saying it had hurt their communities and removed protections that were important to them. She thanked all those who showed up and showed aroha, saying that was what sustained the party after it was ejected from Parliament in 2017. Ngarewa-Packer’s speech was a powerful reminder of the importance of compassion, empathy, and understanding in politics, as she highlighted the need for a more nuanced and thoughtful approach to addressing the country’s challenges.
Conclusion
The adjournment debate marked the end of a significant year in New Zealand politics, one marked by challenges, controversies, and significant disagreements between the parties. As the country looks ahead to 2026, it is clear that the coming year will be just as eventful and unpredictable. The leaders’ speeches highlighted the need for a more nuanced and thoughtful approach to addressing the country’s challenges, one that takes into account the needs and perspectives of all New Zealanders. As the country heads into the summer break, it is clear that the future of New Zealand politics will be shaped by the interactions and decisions of its leaders, and that the coming year will be one to watch.

