Key Takeaways
- Trump’s endorsement of Republican Steve Hilton has eased Democratic fears of a GOP lock‑out in California’s top‑two primary.
- The sudden withdraw of Rep. Eric Swalwell after sexual‑misconduct allegations reshuffles the Democratic field, removing a nascent front‑runner.
- Self‑funded billionaire Tom Steyer currently leads Democrats due to massive ad spending, but his support remains in the low double‑digits and faces vulnerability to attacks on his progressive bona fides.
- Moderate San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan offers the clearest alternative lane for centrist Democrats, yet his Silicon Valley backing and criticism of Governor Newsom limit broader appeal.
- Former Rep. Katie Porter and former Attorney General Xavier Becerra could regain traction if voters seek a “steady” candidate after the Swalwell scandal, but limited funding hampers their ability to break out.
- With ballots mailing May 4 and a CNN debate looming, the race remains fluid; no Democrat has yet secured a decisive advantage, and the outcome will hinge on who can consolidate the fragmented progressive and moderate votes.
The California gubernatorial contest has entered a volatile phase. Just weeks ago Democrats worried that a split Republican vote could allow two GOP candidates to finish first and second in the June 2 top‑two primary, shutting the party out of the general election. President Trump’s April 6 endorsement of Steve Hilton, a former Fox commentator, altered that calculus. By consolidating the Republican vote behind Hilton, the endorsement reduces the chance that Hilton and his rival Chad Bianco split the GOP electorate evenly, thereby lowering the vote total a Democrat needs to reach the top two. Strategists now view the GOP lock‑out risk as largely resolved, shifting the focus to which Democrat will emerge as the leading contender.
That focus became murkier after Rep. Eric Swalwell’s campaign imploded. Following detailed allegations of sexual assault published by CNN and the San Francisco Chronicle, Swalwell withdrew, removing a candidate who had been gaining polling momentum and key union endorsements. His departure frees up Democratic‑leaning voters but also leaves the party without a clear front‑runner, intensifying scramble among the remaining hopefuls.
Tom Steyer now enjoys the most favorable position, primarily because of his financial firepower. As of mid‑May he had poured roughly $116 million into television and digital ads—about three‑quarters of total spending by all candidates. This saturation gives him strong name recognition; many voters may simply pick the only name they recall on the ballot. Yet his support remains modest, hovering in the low double‑digits, and critics warn that overexposure could breed voter fatigue, echoing the 1998 experience of self‑funded candidate Al Checchi. Steyer’s unabashedly progressive platform—Medicare for All, prosecution of federal immigration agents, openness to a wealth tax—appeals to the party’s left wing but also exposes him to attacks highlighting his past investments in private prisons, ICE‑related firms, and fossil fuels. Opponents argue he is an opportunistic billionaire masquerading as a Bernie‑style populist.
The most prominent alternative for moderate Democrats is San Jose Mayor Matt Mahan. He has positioned himself as a pragmatic technocrat, promising to reassess regulations, curb homelessness, and freeze taxes until state spending is better monitored. Mahan’s advertising emphasizes his executive experience and contrasts him with “Washington congressmen” and “Wall Street tycoons.” However, his reliance on Silicon Valley donors—some linked to Peter Thiel and Trump‑aligned figures—raises concerns among progressive voters, and his recent criticism of Governor Gavin Newsom (calling his performance a “C”) clashes with the incumbent’s 80 % approval among state Democrats. Should Mahan gain traction, Steyer is expected to launch aggressive counter‑attacks.
Other Democrats face uphill battles. Former Rep. Katie Porter, despite an early lead, lost ground after a viral clip showed her berating a TV reporter; she remains a strong progressive voice but struggles to regain momentum without major funding. Former Attorney General Xavier Becerra, meanwhile, boasts an impressive résumé but has failed to inspire excitement; some strategists believe he could benefit if voters seek a “steady” candidate after the Swalwell scandal, yet his limited resources hinder a breakthrough. The California Teachers Association’s recent shift of its endorsement to Steyer signals growing establishment confidence in his viability, but the race remains open.
With county ballots set to mail on May 4 and a CNN debate scheduled for the following night, the final weeks will test whether any candidate can translate name recognition, money, or issue positioning into decisive voter support. Until a clear front‑runner emerges, Democrats remain cautiously optimistic about avoiding a GOP lock‑out but uncertain about who will ultimately carry the party’s banner into the general election.

