Key Takeaways
- Israel’s occupation of Palestine has increasingly relied on AI‑driven surveillance and targeting systems, a trend that began in the 2010s and accelerated after October 2023.
- The Israeli military’s Unit 8200 developed “Lavender,” an AI program that generated at least 37,000 kill‑list recommendations in its first two months, with officers spending as little as 20 seconds per target and an estimated 10 % error rate.
- Gendered violence is a core feature of these operations; the Palestinian Feminist Collective’s 200‑page “Predatory State” report links AI‑facilitated domicide to the systematic destruction of Palestinian homes, families, and reproductive futures.
- Additional AI tools—“Where’s Daddy?,” “Gospel,” and the biometric database “Wolf Pack” (including the mobile app “Blue Wolf”)—track Palestinians, accelerate strike selection, and enable soldiers to compile photo leaderboards for surveillance.
- U.S. funding and corporate collaboration are substantial: Meta supplied WhatsApp data for Lavender, Palantir supports ground attacks (including the 2024 Lebanon pager explosions), and Amazon works with Flock on similar tracking technologies; ICE now uses Palantir’s AI to monitor immigrants.
- Experts warn that AI reproduces the biases of its programmers, turning technological tools into instruments of atrocity when lacking ethical governance, and call for greater Western media scrutiny and independent research.
Background of AI Surveillance in Palestine
The roots of Israel’s AI‑assisted policing stretch back to the 2010s, when facial‑recognition software was first “tested” at checkpoints and integrated into large information‑gathering databases through cyber‑warfare programs. As the latest genocidal campaign in Gaza and the West Bank intensified after October 7 2023, the Occupation came to depend heavily on these automated systems, which are “majorly funded by the U.S.” This shift marked a move from intermittent surveillance to a continuous, algorithm‑driven apparatus capable of processing vast amounts of personal data in real time.
Lavender AI and Kill‑List Generation
In the first two months following the October 2023 escalation, the Israeli military’s Unit 8200 deployed an AI program named Lavender specifically to automate “kill lists.” According to +972 Magazine (April 2024), Lavender produced at least 37,000 recommendations for “human targets.” Officers reportedly spent as little as 20 seconds reviewing each target before approving strikes, rendering human oversight little more than a “rubber stamp.” With a reported error rate of around 10 %, the system misidentified thousands of civilians, turning algorithmic efficiency into lethal indiscriminacy.
Gendered Violence and the Predatory State Report
Sarah Dweik of the Palestinian Feminist Collective (PFC) discussed the organization’s 200‑page report, “Predatory State,” which details how Israel’s AI‑assisted technologies facilitate gendered violence. Dweik told Palestine Square, “What we saw happening in Gaza, the levels of destruction and the genocide, showcase how domicide is not only facilitated by people, but in Gaza it was facilitated by surveillance technologies and AI.” She added that between October 7 and October 15 2023, AI‑facilitated targeting “had already seen 47 Palestinian families completely eliminated from the civil registry.” By April 2025, more than 90 % of the infrastructure destroyed in Gaza had been targeted using AI, according to the same report.
Targeting Infrastructure and Domicide
The PFC report emphasizes that Israel’s actions are not merely about killing individuals but about erasing Palestinian futurity. Dweik explained, “Not only do we see the systemic gendered nature of Israel’s actions that are targeting homes, individuals, families, and generations to eliminate and attack Palestinian futurity, but also the ability to have a safe place to nurture and take care of oneself and others.” The AI systems generate strike locations that then guide ground operations—bulldozing homes, cemeteries, and other sites—turning algorithmic output into physical erasure of Palestinian life‑supporting spaces.
Specific AI Tools: Where’s Daddy?, Gospel, Wolf Pack
Beyond Lavender, the occupation employs a suite of specialized AI tools. “Where’s Daddy?” uses lists from Lavender to geographically track Palestinians and alerts intelligence officers when they return to family homes at night. “Gospel” accelerates the generation and selection of physical strike locations, shortening the kill‑chain. “Wolf Pack” is a biometric intelligence database that stores Palestinians’ facial, fingerprint, and other data; its mobile companion “Blue Wolf” lets soldiers upload photographs of Palestinians directly into the database. These tools were first reported during the May 2021 Gaza attacks or at checkpoints and became “fully operational” by October 2023.
U.S. Funding and Corporate Collaboration
Although neither the Israeli Occupation Forces (IOF) nor the U.S. military openly admits direct funding, the PFC’s research uncovered direct collaboration with U.S.-based companies such as Meta and Palantir. On May 18 2024, Sada Social revealed that Meta provided data from WhatsApp groups containing the names of Palestinians or activists wanted by Israel to support Project Lavender. In December 2025, Palantir co‑founder Alex Karp wrote that his company was “extensively supporting various ground attacks in Gaza and Lebanon,” including the 2024 exploding pager attacks in Lebanon that killed over 40 people and injured roughly 3,500. Amazon also partners with Flock to replicate similar tracking capabilities.
Domestic Implications: ICE and Palantir
The reach of these technologies extends beyond Palestine. Dweik warned, “We also understand the tools and the technologies that kill our people in Palestine are also being used in the U.S.” The American Immigration Council’s 2025 research showed that ICE is currently using Palantir’s AI system to track immigrants’ movements and flag individuals for targeted action, mirroring Lavender’s function in Gaza. This trans‑national deployment underscores how algorithmic warfare tools can be repurposed for domestic surveillance and enforcement.
Expert Testimonies: Wes Bryant on AI Bias
Wes Bryant, a retired U.S. Air Force Master Sergeant, told Palestine Square that he shifted his research to oppose “egregious, tragic strikes against the Palestinian population” after seeing officials claim the Israeli military adhered to international law. Bryant observed, “If AI actually is not used responsibly, ethically, and transparently, and there’s no proper governance both by a host nation or any nation using it and by the international community, then it can be a tool for incredible atrocity.” He stressed that AI’s outputs reflect the biases of its programmers, warning that without oversight the technology becomes a conduit for systemic oppression.
Medical Evidence: Dr. Mimi Syed on Drone Targeting of Children
Dr. Mimi Syed, an emergency‑medical physician who undertook two medical missions to Gaza in 2024, co‑authored a June 2026 report with Bryant on the IOF’s use of quadcopters. Based on medical imaging and forensic analysis of injuries treated between August and September 2024, the report identified a pattern of “highly precise and troubling applications of lethal force utilizing small tactical ‘sniper’ drones against children,” with wound morphology indicating shots made at a specific angle and projectile type. The IOF relies on private firms like Smart Shooter to design these drones and embed AI algorithms for “lock‑on targeting” or “threat detection.” United Nations experts have concluded that these AI‑driven systems have directly caused the death of thousands of Palestinian children, despite Israel and the U.S. touting their precision and investing heavily—at least $31.7 million in U.S. contracts with Smart Shooter.
Conclusion and Call for Continued Research
The evidence presented demonstrates that Israel’s occupation has evolved into a predatory state where AI surveillance, targeting algorithms, and corporate partnerships enable large‑scale, gendered violence and the systematic erasure of Palestinian life. As Dweik urges, continued independent research is essential to expose how these technologies map, categorize, and gather data on Palestinian lives. Moreover, the trans‑national deployment of similar AI tools by ICE and other agencies highlights a global challenge: without ethical oversight, transparent governance, and international accountability, artificial intelligence risks becoming a tool for atrocity rather than a safeguard for humanity. Continued scrutiny, especially from Western media and academic circles, is vital to curb this trajectory and protect vulnerable populations worldwide.
https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/israel-used-ai-assisted-technology-to-destroy-infrastructure-in-gaza