Environmental Justice in America: A Social Perspective on Federal Prosecution Trends

Key Takeaways

  • Environmental inequality is a significant issue in the United States, with communities of color and low-income areas disproportionately affected by pollution and environmental crimes.
  • Research has shown that environmental enforcement and sentencing can be influenced by factors such as race, income, and geography.
  • The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has implemented various strategies to address environmental inequality, including the creation of environmental justice offices and the use of data-driven approaches to identify areas of high environmental risk.
  • Despite these efforts, environmental inequality persists, and further research is needed to understand the complex relationships between environmental crime, justice, and inequality.

Introduction to Environmental Inequality
Environmental inequality refers to the disproportionate impact of environmental pollution and degradation on certain communities, often based on factors such as race, income, and geography. This issue has been extensively studied in the United States, where research has shown that communities of color and low-income areas are more likely to be affected by environmental hazards such as toxic waste, air pollution, and water contamination. For example, a study by Salazar et al. (2019) found that environmental inequality in the U.S. states was influenced by factors such as race, income, and geography, with communities of color and low-income areas experiencing higher levels of environmental degradation.

The Role of Environmental Enforcement
Environmental enforcement plays a critical role in addressing environmental inequality, as it can help to prevent and punish environmental crimes. However, research has shown that environmental enforcement can be influenced by factors such as race, income, and geography. For example, a study by Lynch et al. (2004) found that environmental law violation fines against petroleum refineries were influenced by factors such as race, ethnicity, and income, with communities of color and low-income areas experiencing higher levels of environmental degradation. Additionally, a study by Kremer (2016) found that environmental sentencing in the United States Pacific Northwest was influenced by factors such as geography, with rural areas experiencing higher levels of environmental crime.

The Impact of Geography on Environmental Inequality
Geography plays a significant role in environmental inequality, as certain areas are more prone to environmental hazards due to factors such as climate, topography, and land use. For example, a study by Thomson et al. (2020) found that environmental crime was clustered in certain areas, with urban areas experiencing higher levels of environmental crime. Additionally, a study by Ozymy and Jarrell (2017) found that federal environmental crime prosecutions varied across U.S. states, with some states experiencing higher levels of environmental crime due to factors such as geography and politics.

The Role of the Environmental Protection Agency
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) plays a critical role in addressing environmental inequality, as it is responsible for enforcing environmental laws and regulations. The EPA has implemented various strategies to address environmental inequality, including the creation of environmental justice offices and the use of data-driven approaches to identify areas of high environmental risk. For example, the EPA’s FY 2022-2026 strategic plan outlines a commitment to environmental justice, with a focus on addressing environmental inequality and promoting environmental justice in communities of color and low-income areas.

Challenges and Future Directions
Despite the efforts of the EPA and other organizations, environmental inequality persists, and further research is needed to understand the complex relationships between environmental crime, justice, and inequality. For example, a study by Johnson et al. (2020) found that the criminalization of environmental harm was influenced by factors such as politics and economics, with certain types of environmental crime being more likely to be prosecuted than others. Additionally, a study by Greenberg (2025) found that county-level environmental and social influences on EPA criminal prosecutions varied across the United States, highlighting the need for further research on the local-level factors that influence environmental enforcement.

Conclusion
In conclusion, environmental inequality is a significant issue in the United States, with communities of color and low-income areas disproportionately affected by pollution and environmental crimes. Research has shown that environmental enforcement and sentencing can be influenced by factors such as race, income, and geography, and that the EPA plays a critical role in addressing environmental inequality. However, further research is needed to understand the complex relationships between environmental crime, justice, and inequality, and to identify effective strategies for addressing environmental inequality in the United States.

Click Spread

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top