DUP Blocks Progress on Trans Hate Crime Legislation

Key Takeaways:

• The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) has been accused of stalling plans to include transgender people as a "protected" group in new hate crime legislation for Northern Ireland.
• The proposal, put forward by Justice Minister Naomi Long, aims to provide equality and protection for transgender individuals who have been subjected to hate crimes.
• Other executive parties, including Sinn Féin and the Ulster Unionist Party, have expressed support for the proposal, but the DUP has not responded to Long’s letter seeking approval.
• The bill, which also includes tougher sentences for those who cause death by dangerous driving, requires approval from all executive parties before it can be introduced to the assembly.

Introduction to the Controversy
The Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) has been accused of stalling plans to include transgender people as a "protected" group in new hate crime legislation for Northern Ireland. The proposal, put forward by Justice Minister Naomi Long, aims to provide equality and protection for transgender individuals who have been subjected to hate crimes. Long wrote to other executive parties at the start of November seeking approval for the move, but the DUP has not responded to her letter, sparking concerns that they are attempting to block the proposal.

The Proposal and Its Significance
The proposal aims to include transgender identity as a protected characteristic in hate crime legislation, alongside existing protected groups such as race, sexual orientation, religion, and disability. Long’s letter cited Police Service of Northern Ireland (PSNI) statistics, which showed that there had been close to 100 transgender identity incidents or hate crimes between July 2024 and June 2025. The minister argued that the measure would "increase protection for transgender people who have been subjected to hate crime… and provide parity of protection against hate crime across the LGBTQI+ community." The proposal is significant, as it would provide much-needed protection for a vulnerable group that has been subjected to hate crimes and discrimination.

The DUP’s Response
The DUP has said that it can only come to a view on the issue "upon the submission of a formal paper containing the relevant proposals." A party spokesperson added that its ministers "carefully consider all executive papers and as part of the confidential executive process seek further clarification and information in coming to a view on any paper." However, Alliance assembly member John Blair has accused the DUP of attempting to block the proposal, saying that they have "form on this issue." The DUP’s failure to respond to Long’s letter by the requested deadline of mid-November has sparked concerns that they are stalling the proposal.

Support from Other Executive Parties
Other executive parties, including Sinn Féin and the Ulster Unionist Party, have expressed support for the proposal. It is understood that they told Long that they would support her proposal, but the DUP’s failure to respond has delayed the process. The first and deputy first ministers also wrote to Long last month, saying that any "additional provisions" would require executive agreement in the "normal way," via a paper to the executive with formal recommendations. The support from other executive parties highlights the importance of the proposal and the need for the DUP to reconsider their stance.

The Broader Context
The proposal comes after a Supreme Court ruling earlier this year that said a woman is defined in law by biological sex. The ruling had significant implications for single-sex spaces in Great Britain, such as female changing rooms and toilets. Long has argued that hate crime is a criminal offence separate from equality law and that therefore, she believes it is important to "address the gap" in providing protection for victims of transgender hate crime. The proposed sentencing bill, which includes the hate crime provisions, would also impose tougher sentences on people who cause death by dangerous driving and introduce hate crime provisions that would modernize current laws and provide greater protections for all victims.

Conclusion and Next Steps
The proposal to include transgender people as a protected group in hate crime legislation is an important step towards providing equality and protection for a vulnerable group. The support from other executive parties highlights the importance of the proposal, and the need for the DUP to reconsider their stance. The bill, which requires approval from all executive parties, is currently stalled due to the DUP’s failure to respond to Long’s letter. It is essential that the DUP engages with the proposal and works towards finding a solution that provides protection for all individuals, regardless of their gender identity. The fate of the proposal remains uncertain, but it is clear that the issue will continue to be a topic of debate and discussion in the coming months.