PressReleaseCloud.io

McLaren Norris & Piastri Disqualified After Las Vegas F1 GP Inspection

Press Release

Summary: McLaren Norris & Piastri Disqualified After Las Vegas F1 GP Inspection

McLaren Norris & Piastri Disqualified After Las Vegas F1 GP Inspection

McLaren’s hopes for the championship were dealt a severe blow when both Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri were disqualified from the Las Vegas Grand Prix. What was supposed to be a successful night for the Woking-based team turned into a nightmare when post-race scrutineering revealed illegal wear on the skid blocks under both cars. The violation, discovered hours after the checkered flag, wiped out Norris’s second-place finish and Piastri’s fourth-place result, dramatically changing the championship landscape with just two race weekends left.

After the race, the FIA technical delegate, Jo Bauer, called in McLaren representatives to inspect their cars. The technical breach was due to the wooden plank assembly underneath both McLarens being thinner than the minimum required thickness according to regulations. This type of violation is a surefire disqualification in Formula 1, leaving little room for interpretation or appeal.

The Reason Both McLaren Cars Didn’t Pass the Post-Race Inspection

The Las Vegas street circuit, with its distinctive mix of new asphalt, chilly weather, and high speeds, posed a unique set of challenges for teams attempting to manage ride height. McLaren seems to have overstepped the boundaries by running their cars very close to the ground to optimize aerodynamic performance. While this approach may have increased their speed, it resulted in too much wear on the compulsory skid blocks that protect the undersides of the cars and guarantee they keep a minimum ride height.

The wooden plank assembly under a Formula 1 car has to maintain a certain thickness, according to the sport’s technical regulations. This rule is in place mainly for safety reasons and to keep teams from getting an unfair aerodynamic advantage by running their cars too close to the ground. FIA officials measured the planks on both McLaren cars and found that they had worn down more than allowed during the 50-lap race.

Illegal Plank Wear Measurements: What the FIA Found

The FIA’s inspection process for plank wear involves precise measurements taken at multiple points underneath the car. Technical regulations specify that the wooden plank must be 10mm thick when new, with a tolerance that allows for no more than 1mm of wear during a race, meaning it must measure at least 9mm at all points after racing. Both McLaren cars were found to have worn their planks below this critical threshold, particularly in the rear section where downforce is heaviest.

“A document released by the FIA, written by technical delegate Jo Bauer, confirmed that Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri’s cars both had rear skids measuring below the legal minimum in post-race inspection, typically a slam-dunk disqualification offence.”

The inspection process was thorough and conclusive. After initial measurements raised red flags, McLaren representatives were present for secondary measurements that confirmed the original findings. In fact, the official FIA report indicated that the secondary measurements showed even greater plank wear than initially detected, leaving race stewards with no choice but to disqualify both cars from the event. The decision comes amidst other unexpected events impacting the racing community.

Regulations on Skid Block Thickness

Formula 1 has technical regulations regarding skid block thickness for both safety and competition. The wooden plank, usually made of jabroc (a laminated wood composite), runs the length of the car’s floor and is a critical measurement point for ride height. Article 3.5.9 of the F1 Technical Regulations states that this plank must have a minimum thickness of 9mm after a race, allowing for only 1mm of wear from its original 10mm specification.

Teams are always trying to find the perfect balance between the performance benefit of running cars closer to the ground and the risk of too much plank wear. The closer the ride height is to the ground, the more downforce is generated through the ground effect, which could potentially shave off a few tenths of a second per lap. But as this Las Vegas incident shows, the margins are razor thin – tiny measurement differences ended up costing McLaren 27 precious championship points.

Unusual Track Conditions and Porpoising at Play

The Las Vegas street circuit posed a unique set of challenges that likely played a part in McLaren’s plank wear exceeding the limits. The combination of freshly laid asphalt, unusually cold nighttime temperatures of around 16°C (60°F), and high-speed straights created a set of conditions where cars could potentially experience unexpected porpoising or bottoming out. These conditions might have taken McLaren off guard, as their simulations and practice runs may not have accurately predicted how the cars would behave over the full race distance.

Moreover, the fuel load alters throughout the race, which affects the ride height calculations. As cars burn fuel and become lighter, they naturally ride higher. However, if the initial setup is too aggressive, even this natural lift might not prevent excessive wear. The long straights of Las Vegas, where cars reached speeds over 350 km/h, created maximum downforce scenarios that pushed the cars closer to the ground than expected.

Championship Standings Take a Hit

The disqualification of both racers has caused quite a stir in the F1 championship. Lando Norris, who was leading comfortably, has seen his lead diminish, giving Max Verstappen a glimmer of hope for his fourth consecutive world title. Norris had significantly narrowed the gap before the disqualification, and he was the favorite with a lot of momentum going into the final races.

Norris and Verstappen’s New Points Gap

Verstappen is now only 24 points behind Norris with two race weekends left – the Qatar Sprint weekend and the season finale in Abu Dhabi, thanks to the disqualification. This 26-point swing (from the 18 points Norris would have gained on Verstappen for finishing second) has completely changed the championship outlook. Verstappen could win the championship by scoring just 25 points more than Norris in the final events, with a maximum of 60 points still up for grabs (26 per Grand Prix, 8 for Sprint race).

Piastri’s Championship Hopes

The disqualification is a major blow to Oscar Piastri’s outstanding rookie season. He has now fallen behind Ferrari’s Charles Leclerc in the standings and has virtually no chance of winning the championship. Piastri was making a late-season surge and his consistent performance made him a long shot for the championship. For more details on the disqualification, visit the McLaren shock double FIA disqualification article.

Effects on the Constructor’s Championship

McLaren’s double disqualification also has a significant impact on the constructor’s championship. Instead of potentially surpassing Red Bull with a hefty points gain, the gap between the two teams has now increased. McLaren, who are chasing their first constructor’s title since 1998, now face a tougher challenge. They will need near-perfect performances in the remaining races.

How Other Drivers Benefited from the DQ

The ripple effects of McLaren’s disqualification benefited several drivers. George Russell inherited second place, while Charles Leclerc moved up to third. Every driver behind them gained two positions in the final classification, with some drivers scoring points who originally finished outside the top ten. These unexpected points could prove crucial in the tight midfield battle between teams like Alpine, Williams, and RB.

McLaren’s Reaction to the Disqualification

McLaren wasted no time in responding to the disqualification, voicing their regret and extending apologies to both drivers for the technical infringement. The team’s reaction was thoughtful and professional, accepting the stewards’ ruling without contesting the results or trying to shift blame. This kind of openness is characteristic of team principal Andrea Stella’s leadership since he assumed control of McLaren.

McLaren Says Sorry to Their Drivers

McLaren released an official statement in which they apologized directly to Lando Norris and Oscar Piastri, recognizing the blow this dealt to their championship hopes. The team was particularly upset that the stellar performances of their drivers on the demanding Las Vegas track were invalidated through no fault of their own. This apology shows that McLaren realizes the substantial opportunity that was lost for their drivers, especially Norris, who has been making a strong end-of-season push for the championship.

McLaren’s Defense

McLaren defended the plank damage as unintentional, blaming it on the unique conditions of the Las Vegas circuit. The circuit’s fresh tarmac and cold temperatures created unexpected conditions that led to more aggressive plank wear than their simulations had predicted. According to McLaren, the cars had passed all pre-race scrutineering checks with compliant plank measurements, indicating the issue developed during the race itself.

The engineers at McLaren pointed out certain parts of the track where the cars may have bottomed out more than expected. The long straightaways and high speeds of the Las Vegas street circuit created scenarios with maximum downforce that could have led to the excessive wear, especially as the cars got lighter with fuel burn throughout the race.

Not Trying to Cheat

The McLaren team was quick to point out that they did not try to break the rules on purpose. They said that they set up the cars the best way they knew how, given the track conditions and how they thought the tires would wear down. But it seems they made a mistake. Still, in Formula 1, it doesn’t matter why you broke the rules. If you break them, you get penalized.

“McLaren’s team was present for the measurements, which confirmed that the skids were not in compliance with the rules. The measurements were even less than what the Technical Delegate had originally measured.”

Red Flags During the Race

Upon reviewing the team radio communications, it was revealed that McLaren may have been concerned about possible plank wear towards the end of the race. There were several cryptic messages to Norris in particular, which suggested that the team was watching telemetry data that showed potential compliance issues developing as the race went on.

Norris Instructed to Reduce Speed in Final Laps

During the last laps of the Grand Prix, Norris’ race engineer instructed him to control his speed, even though he had a safe distance from the cars behind him. What at first appeared to be a standard precaution may have been the team noticing increasing plank wear problems and trying to prevent further damage. Norris was instructed to “lift and coast” into corners and avoid using aggressive kerbs – methods that lessen the impact forces on the car’s underside.

Unfortunately, these directives were issued too late to rectify the situation. The damage to the planks had most likely already occurred during the earlier stages of the race when the cars were heavier due to the fuel and were running at maximum downforce. The last-minute modifications were not enough to bring the cars back into the required technical specifications.

Odd Team Radio Chatter

Team communications were also analyzed, and some strange conversations between Piastri and his race engineer were found. While these messages were not as clear as the ones to Norris, they did include coded instructions about protecting the underside of the car and avoiding specific kerbs. This chatter indicates that McLaren may have realized there were potential compliance issues during the race, but they may not have fully understood how serious these issues were until the post-race inspection.

Previous F1 Disqualifications That Mirror This One

While McLaren’s double disqualification is definitely a shock, it’s not the first time something like this has happened in Formula 1. There have been many disqualifications over the years due to technical infringements, but it’s rare for such a thing to happen so late in the season and have such a big impact on the championship.

Lewis Hamilton’s DRS Violation in Brazil 2021

A recent case that bears some similarity to this one is Lewis Hamilton’s disqualification from the qualifying rounds of the 2021 Brazilian Grand Prix due to a technical violation of the DRS (Drag Reduction System). Hamilton’s rear wing opening was just a fraction of a millimeter over the allowed maximum, which led to his disqualification from the qualifying rounds. However, unlike the situation with McLaren, Hamilton was able to recover from this setback during the race weekend and ended up winning the race in what was one of his most impressive performances.

Other Breaches of Technical Regulations

Formula 1 has experienced several technical disqualifications in recent years. In 2019, both Renault cars were disqualified from the Japanese Grand Prix for using an illegal driver aid system. In 2020, Racing Point was heavily penalized for brake duct design violations, although they were not disqualified outright. Each case highlights F1’s strict adherence to technical regulations, regardless of whether the advantage gained was substantial or the violation was intentional.

What’s Next for McLaren’s Title Fight

After their Las Vegas results were wiped from the record books, McLaren now has a steep hill to climb in both championship fights. The team needs to regroup quickly and concentrate on getting the most out of their performance in the final two race weekends while making sure their cars are completely compliant with all technical regulations.

Only Two Races Left: Qatar Sprint Weekend and Abu Dhabi

The championship hopes of McLaren now hinge on their performance at the Qatar Grand Prix, which includes a Sprint race, and the season finale in Abu Dhabi. The Sprint format in Qatar adds a layer of complexity but also a chance, with extra points available that could assist Norris in making up some of his shortfall to Verstappen. Despite the significant setback in Las Vegas, the team has a history of good performance at both remaining circuits, providing a glimmer of hope.

Requirements for Championship Victory

For Norris to clinch the Drivers’ Championship, he must score over 24 points more than Verstappen in the last two weekends. This essentially means that Norris has to come in first in the remaining two races and hope that Verstappen does not place in the top three – a difficult task considering Red Bull’s strong performance this season.

McLaren has a mountain to climb in the Constructors’ Championship, needing to massively outscore Red Bull in the last two races to turn their fortunes around. They also need to keep an eye on Ferrari, who have significantly closed the gap after the Las Vegas disqualifications.

McLaren’s Plan of Action

McLaren will likely have to be more cautious with their car setup in the remaining races due to the disqualification. While speed is still important, adhering to technical rules is now the most important thing. They may have to make some sacrifices in setup that slightly lower speed but make sure the cars will pass the inspection after the race.

Andrea Stella, the team principal, will have to juggle being aggressive and cautious, pushing his drivers to perform at their best while keeping the cars within the technical limits. To avoid a repeat of what happened in Las Vegas, the engineering team will thoroughly review their simulation and setup procedures.

Commonly Asked Questions

After McLaren’s disqualification, a lot of questions have been raised by fans and analysts about the technical violation and how it will affect the championship. Here are some answers to the most frequently asked questions. For more insights on global sporting events, you might be interested in Germany’s role in the G20 summit.

What is the plank/skid block on an F1 car?

The plank or skid block is a compulsory part that extends the full length of the underside of an F1 car. It’s made of a particular wood composite material known as jabroc, and it’s used as a reference for measuring ride height and stopping teams from running cars too low to the ground. The rules state that this plank must be 10mm thick when it’s new and can’t wear down more than 1mm during a race, which means it must be at least 9mm at all inspection points after racing.

Was there anything McLaren could have done to avoid this disqualification?

Indeed, there were several steps McLaren could have taken to avoid this disqualification:

Here are the key points:

The team admitted in their post-race analysis that they had not fully understood the effect of Las Vegas’ unique track features on plank wear. They could have avoided the technical violation while still potentially achieving good results with more precise simulations or a more cautious setup approach.

Does McLaren have the right to contest the stewards’ decision?

Although teams have the ability to contest stewards’ decisions, McLaren has suggested they will not go down this path. The technical infringement was unambiguous, with measurements verified by both FIA officials and McLaren representatives. In instances of objective technical violations such as minimum thickness requirements, appeals are seldom successful unless there was a procedural error in the measurement process.

McLaren’s acceptance of the decision shows they understand that the infringement, though unintentional, was unquestionable on technical grounds. The team has decided to concentrate their efforts on the remaining races rather than going through a possibly fruitless appeals process.

How much could this disqualification cost McLaren in prize money?

McLaren’s disqualification could have financial repercussions beyond the loss of championship points. The distribution of prize money in Formula 1 is directly related to the final championship standings, with large variations between finishing positions. If McLaren’s disqualification ends up costing them a place in the Constructors’ Championship, the financial penalty could be in the tens of millions of dollars – potentially between $10-15 million depending on the final standings.

Has a contender for the championship ever been disqualified this late in the season?

While disqualifications have taken place in the past throughout the history of Formula 1, McLaren’s current situation is relatively unparalleled in terms of the impact on the championship this late in the season. The most similar recent case might be Michael Schumacher’s disqualification from the entire 1997 championship for purposely colliding with Jacques Villeneuve in the final race. However, that was due to his driving behavior rather than a technical violation.

In 1976, James Hunt was disqualified from his victory at the Spanish Grand Prix due to a car width violation, although this happened earlier in the season. Michael Schumacher was disqualified from two races in 1994 for technical and sporting code violations during his championship fight with Damon Hill.

The timing of McLaren’s double disqualification is notable, given that it occurred with only two races left in the season and has had a significant impact on a close championship battle. The 26-point swing for Norris is one of the biggest changes in championship momentum resulting from a technical disqualification in modern F1 history.

The team is now shifting their attention to Qatar and Abu Dhabi, knowing that they need to execute flawlessly in these races while making sure their cars are in full compliance with F1’s stringent technical regulations. For McLaren, the harsh lesson learned in Las Vegas has significantly upped the ante for the final chapter of the 2023 season.

Exit mobile version